Increasing the protection offered by a helmet has been an age-old quest. From edged weapons to arrows, fragmentation to bullets, it's always been a type of arms race to provide the next best solution to protect our heads.
In World War One, Germany offered one of the first up-armor or applique solutions to their common M17 helmet. This front plate was applied via ventilation lugs on the side of the helmet and a leather strap going around the back. This provided increased protection, especially in trench warfare where the user's head was generally the first target presented. You can still buy them today here, but it will cost you!
Moving on to more modern-day solutions, you will see that the materials have changed slightly, but the general concept of adding extra material or an applique is largely the same. Velocity Systems has created what they call a SLAAP plate that attaches to modern day high cut helmets to provide the user with increased ballistic protection. This plate is designed to stop 7.62 X 39 caliber, 123 gr. FMG with mild steel core penetrator at 2,400 FPS. All while keeping backface deformation under 25.4 mm (1 in). While many experts believe the safe deformation measurement should be under 16mm for helmets to prevent TBI and skull fractures. Something is certainly better than nothing.
Photo From http://soldiersystems.net/2012/09/27/ach-slaap-velocity-systems/
Another concept that we have been working on here at Hard Head Veterans in conjunction with Revolution Armor is to not only defeat 7.62 X 39, but also 7.62 X 51 and 5.56 at full rifle velocities utilizing next-generation metals. The problem with these is they are much heavier than ceramic or fiber up-armor options. They do however stop the mentioned threats above, at full rifle velocities and with minimal backface deformation. The other issue with these next-generation metals is their extreme hardness. They are very difficult to form into curvatures that will fit a ballistic helmet and still maintain their ballistic qualities. Designs like these would only be best suited for static type helmet use, such as in a gun turret, or for a very short period of time while mobile.
One question you may be asking, is what about the face? As with everything in helmet armor solutions, there seem to be trade-offs and with face protection, it's no different. You have to trade off the cost of weight and vision, for protection and coverage. On the market currently, there are a number of options that address this issue. From the common face shield, you see riot police wearing that may offer blunt to ballistic protection. To full mandibles and cheek protection like you would see on helmets of ancient times. 3M captured the most recent U.S. Army ballistic helmet award for their IHPS helmet that provides all of these things.
As more and more technology is improved, created, and applied. Up-Armor helmet options will as well. Perhaps, in the near future, we won't even need to wear helmets, but just activate our star trek type force shield for protection.
Comments will be approved before showing up.